|
Control, Power and Strategy Seminar
|
|
|
|
|
We can't solve our problems at the same level of consciousness that created them.
This presentation brings together a new tool to help assess the strategic developmental stage of the organization, called the Spectrum of Human Needs, with the ethics required in many of the new strategy directions, and leadership requirements. Together they form a solid kernel of understanding about people, upon which organizations can build a sustainable program for change.
In the last analysis it is people who make or break the success of any program. It is people who resist, and people who must change to improve performance, increase excellence and sustain quality. People are thinking human beings who have a variety of needs. These needs sometimes get in the way of learning and prevent change from happening. Not meeting these needs can generate resistance and sabotage potentially effective programs. This presentation will explore the relationship between resistance, excellence and an individuals thinking and knowing capabilities.
The Transformational Learning and Performance Matrix provides a framework for learning that ties directly into performance needs. The seven levels of knowing; data, information, knowledge, managing, integration, wisdom, and union form a nested hierarchy of logical levels. Each level requiring the integration of the previous level and a higher order of mental processing, as well. This expanding complexity pertains to the task orientation too. The task sequencing moves from data gathering, to procedural, through functional, managing, integrating, renewing, and union - connecting to the next larger system. The model is not linear, so each level is enmeshed in each of the others.
The Spectrum of Human Needs offers a window through which to view the underlying needs of the organizations culture. The five basic needs that people focus on start with the need for basic security, safety, food/lodging etc. Once those are established then the focus becomes "the rules of the game" i.e. what kind of behavior is accepted and approved. The third focus is personal power, "How can I make my mark here?" The fourth involves relationships as a learning focus, so diversity is valued and explored. The fifth is personal discovery or Maslow's self-actualization. Here the individual is secure enough to begin to deeply explore their own potential. Organizationally each level has its own management style and contribution. What works at one level, just gets in the way at another. The current shift in management skills is forcing a move from a corporate culture based on rules and personal power to a culture based upon relationships and self-expression. To do this effectively management must begin to strategize the transition, as well as vision the result. Together these two speak to the kinds of communication and strategies necessary to move organizations from one level of performance into another.
This workshop introduces Holistic Knowing©, an innovative development program, the third tool in this strategic approach to managing transition. Holistic Knowing© is a course or training designed to facilitate leaders and managers in their ability to:
Holistic Knowing© brings together the psychology, systems and theory of knowledge aspects of Dr. W. Edwards Deming's Profound Knowledge with the latest developments in cognitive theory and spirit/mind/body understanding to form a complete approach to knowing holisticly.
Used in concert, these three tools provide
a rich platform upon which to build sustainable change. The learning organization,
coupled with a strong quality culture is able to achieve the flexibility
and innovation that is so crucial to tomorrow's success. The development
of this success will require much more attention to psychology, systems,
and
the theory of knowledge than companies have allocated, up to this
point. This workshop hopes to begin to address this situation.
Goals and Objectives
During this workshop participants can expect to:
Intended Audience
This workshop will
benefit leaders and managers looking to design and implement a new strategic
direction in their company. People who have the responsibility for initiating
or managing change in their organization.
A Business Perspective
Fifteen or so years ago Quality appeared on the American scene. Americans were, by and large, confused between the "Quality Gurus", unable to tell the difference between them. The inability to think critically and systemically has prevented many organizations, to this day, from understanding the significance of the difference, or from being able to learn the lessons that Deming spent so many years trying to teach.
Dr. W. Edwards Deming spent years trying to get leaders of all kinds to understand business issues from a different perspective. The whole point of variation and understanding a system was to get leaders and managers to think differently about their problems. Deming was right, but we need to go farther. His elegant framework, Profound Knowledge forms an incredible lens to help leaders manage differently. Both system and variation induce new ways of thinking. Systems thinking is a must in this age of rapidly changing scenarios, and variation brings a new source of information to the decision making process and that's sorely need.
I have come to believe that the root of the current difficulty in creating sustainable change, is the inability of American managers and leaders to expand the use of their thinking and knowing capacities enough to cogently deal with the new kinds of challenges occurring today. American schools teach subjects, but they don't teach thinking. Thinking is most often thought of as a mental activity, but there are several components of knowing that inform thinking that are not mental. It is for this reason that Holistic Knowing© is composed of six components, only one of which is mental.
They are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of these relates to one or more of the levels of knowing found in the Transformational Learning and Performance Matrix. The framework that the matrix provides allows for clear strategies in both learning and task orientation. Not everyone has the same affinity for each task. This difference in personal affinity is borne out by our personal experience and suggested by other tools, such as the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. While the fact of this difference is not new, the ability to clearly delineate tasks according to levels of knowing is.
The Spectrum of Human Needs looks at another aspect of being human. Built, in part upon the work of Abraham Maslow, the Spectrum is a framework of the evolution of ego development based on the successful fulfillment of five different basic human needs. Each need has its own requirements and its own demands. Each is its own "listening" as well. When a need is holding center stage, it becomes the first priority and the focus of attention. Thus, when it is not satisfied, little else has meaning or relevance. For organizations, this understanding has had significant impact on implementation strategies.
The following matrix
shows the relationship between these two tools.
Spectrum of Human Needs and theTransformational Learning and Performance MatrixShowing areas of concern and the support needed for good performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data
|
Data (Input) |
Data that generates a potential threat or that cretes safety or comfort - relieves anxiety for self |
|
|
|
|
(Action without reflection) |
(Procedures, conformance) |
|
Deep and detailed knowledge of rules and established procedures |
Setting up networks and strategic relationships (old boy/girl networks) |
Interested in psychology, sensative to differences and aware of emotions in people |
|
(Reflection) |
Functional (Work flow, design, engineering) |
Methods that provide protection or comfort |
Clear boundaries, limits of the range of "diverget" behavior allowed |
Skills to obtain power and control |
Curiosity prompting the investigation of differemce |
Understanding connections and interdependence, receptive to possibilities |
Meaning (Understanding context, relationships and trends) |
Manaaging (Understanding what promotes or prevents effectiveness, alternatives, relationships) |
Strategies for self protection, defense, and support |
Doing what's "right," knows the "why" |
Making things happen, looking for the "win" |
Doing the "right" thing, seeing what serves others, drama, fighting for the under dog |
Personal expression, growth, expansion. Risk as self-expression |
(Patterns, assumptions, beliefs, self-organizing systems) |
(Systems thinking, long-term planning, multi-level strategy |
Aquires new knowledge only if it fits with past experience or presents a painful new reality |
Will not go against the established rules, will "change" as ordered. |
Pushing the boundaries, writing new rules, creating breakthroughs |
Creating ways to reap the harvest of mutiple out looks and points of view. Creating new ways to get along |
Ecology of systems, appreciation of aesthetics |
Wisdom (Values and purpose) |
Renewing (Expansion, connection to the larger system) |
Security and pleasure allow expansion |
Inclusion generates confidence |
Obtaining wins leads to benevolence |
A culture of trust that values diversity, gnereates curiosity and exploration |
Renewal comes through interdependence and finding deeper meaning |
Union (Direct experiencal knowing) |
Unity (Expansion, connection to the larger system) |
Self, family, close intitmat relationships |
In group (people like me) and out group. |
Movers and shakers, people in power |
The human family |
At one with the universe |
Taken together these three tools offer a unified way of understanding and working with human diversity from a learning perspective that includes the whole human being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|